"Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people – from creators like you to everyday users – to upload content to platforms like YouTube," she wrote. u/Jackson1442. Consulter l'article # Lancer la recherche d'un LATMP. Print + digital, only £19 for a year. Each country within the EU will be able to interpret the law and how it should be implemented in its own ways. We explain why, By "Some [online platforms] fear that Article 13 requires the implementation of automated ‘upload filters'. This is the part of the Directive on Copyright that has most people worried. Thank You. Until now, platforms have been accused of arbitrary decisions and practices. In a tweet, the Prime Minister's office said that the entire directive "fuels censorship and threatens freedom of expression.". Le membre fait preuve de réserve et de prudence dans son comportement public, notamment dans l’utilisation des technologies de l’information et des communications. Open my cookie preferences. 13. It's become known by the most controversial segment, Article 13, which critics claim will have a detrimental impact on creators online. The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, to use its full name, requires the likes of YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to take more responsibility for copyrighted material being shared illegally on their platforms. Le meilleur moyen pour trouver votre information est de faire une recherche en utilisant le moteur de recherche de notre site. Les contenus de ce site sont informatifs et ont pour objectif d'aider à la compréhension. An earlier version of the Directive referred to “proportionate content recognition technologies” which sounds an awful lot like it’s asking platform owners to use automated filters to scan every piece of uploaded content and stop anything that might violate copyright from being uploaded. James Temperton, iStock/Antonio Guillem/Getty/Joe Sohm/Visions of America. In the video, Matt Koval, a content strategist at YouTube argues that – in its current form – Article 13 "threatens hundreds of thousands of creators, artists and others employed in the creative economy. These include the Society of Authors, and the UK-based Alliance for Intellectual Property and Proponents. The other side of the debate, critics of the Directive, include the influential Silicon Valley lobbying group the CCIA, whose members include Google, Facebook, eBay, Amazon and Netflix. Présence au travail, pauses et repos hebdomadaire, Formation des travailleuses et travailleurs, Licenciement, mise à pied, congédiement et démission, Catégories de travailleuses et travailleurs, Travailleuses et travailleurs d’agences de placement de personnel, Travailleuses et travailleurs de l’industrie du vêtement, Travailleuses et travailleurs étrangers temporaires, Travailleuses et travailleurs saisonniers, Étudiantes et étudiants travaillant dans une colonie de vacances, Rechercher par type de risque ou domaine d'activité, Comment prendre en charge la santé et la sécurité du travail dans votre entreprise, Conditions gagnantes en santé et sécurité du travail, Des capsules de formation pour accompagner votre prise en charge, Conférence et entrevues vidéo avec nos experts, Programme de secourisme en milieu de travail. You may have seen Article 13 described as a “meme killer.” But is the EU banning memes for real? Sur réception d’un acte introductif dans une affaire relevant de la division de la santé et de la sécurité du travail, le Tribunal en délivre une copie aux autres parties et à la Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail. ", Leading the opposition to the Directive on Copyright within the European Parliament has been Julia Reda, an MEP and member of the Pirate Party Germany. 13. No one is really sure how this one would work either. On y stipule plutôt que les actes de procédure et la présentation de la preuve d’une affaire « doivent être proportionnés à sa nature et à sa complexité ». We help companies engage with their stakeholders to deliver sustainability strategies, materiality and reporting with a difference. Press publications “may obtain fair and proportionate remuneration for the digital use of their press publications by information society service providers,” the Directive states. Message the mods. By Six member states (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against adopting the directive while three (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained from the vote. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. YouTube, and YouTubers, have become the most vocal opponents of the proposal. Great style is easy. Please refresh and try again. Considering the recently issued guidance by the IFRS Interpretations Committee for Uncertain Tax Provisions (UTPs), a (re)assessment … In favour of the Directive are industry bodies representing content producers. "If the owners cannot agree, it is impossible to expect the open platforms that host this content to make the correct rights decisions. Article 13. Matt Reynolds. Article 13 (Modification intégrée au c. E-3, a. TRIAL OFFER Sometimes referred to as the 'link tax', Article 11 is aimed at tech giants which … Although the #saveyourinternet campaign has focused on stirring up opposition to the directive among YouTubers and users, the highest echelons of YouTube management have also got in on the opposition. Where personal data relating to a data subject are collected from the data subject, the controller shall, at the time when personal data are obtained, provide the data subject with all of the following information: the identity and the contact details of the controller and, where applicable, of the controller’s representative; the contact details of … Continue reading Art. Article 13 of the EU's new copyright directive has sparked huge controversy online, with YouTube campaigning strongly against the proposal. Still, Article 13 could end up being a turning point in how users interact with content online. As you can probably guess, this means a huge number of sites – from fishing forums to niche social networks – that will need to install upload filters. Shop now. The Directive states that platforms won’t have to pay if they’re sharing “mere hyperlinks which are accompanied by individual words,” but since most links are accompanied by more than a couple of words it seems that many platforms and news aggregators would fall foul of this rule. It's an already unpopular system due to its propensity for false positives and abuse, and this would be heightened if potentially infringing videos could not be uploaded at all. The system then allows them to either block the video or monetise it by running advertising against it. Clothilde Goujard. Consulter LATMP. Required fields are marked * Comment. Then change your phone number. You will hear from us shortly. Article 11 can be considered easier to comprehend than Article 13. LITAT. La semaine normale de travail du salarié qui effectue des travaux sur le territoire de la région de la Baie-James est de 55 heures. The changes have proved controversial, with critics being opposed to two specific parts of the law: Article 11 and Article 13. Il est assez difficile de prédire comment les juges interpréteront ce concept vague et imprécis dans un dossier complexe, tel un dossie… The Directive on Copyright has gained vocal critics on both sides of the debate, but you can broadly chunk up defenders and detractors into two categories. Quoi faire si un accident du travail survient dans votre entreprise? Currently, platforms such as YouTube aren’t responsible for copyright violations, although they must remove that content when directed to do so by the rights holders. Sorry, you have entered an invalid email. Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the … The issue of whether there is a violation of Article 13 is litigated in a pretrial motion hearing. 13. But it may also be a wake up call for site owners, not just in Europe but in the United States and around the world, not to fall victim to non-compliance. Article 13 – we are independent sustainability consultants based in London, supporting clients globally. 1978, c. 5, a. This could put a stop to viral sports GIFs and might even stop people who attended matches from posting photos to social media. ", Alongside the official YouTube explainer, the page hosts a handful of reaction and comment videos from prominent YouTubers. 6. The Directive on Copyright would make online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringements, and supposedly direct more revenue from tech giants towards artists and journalists. Il énonce les moyens d'obtenir l'équivalent de l'apposition d'un sceau, d'un cachet, d'un tampon, d'un timbre ou d'un autre instrument suivant les finalités recherchées par l'utilisation de ces instruments et marques. In the European Parliament the lead MEP presenting the directive to Parliament is Axel Voss, a German MEP and member of the European People’s Party. – The games industry should be worried about Google Stadia, – How the petition to revoke Article 50 went viral, – I tried to keep my baby secret from Facebook and Google, – Care about online privacy? Il est possible que la page que vous cherchez n'existe plus. 13. The Census Bureau is bound by Title 13 of the United States Code. There are still too many variables to know anything for sure, but it is a situation worth following. However, Article 13 of the directive raises serious questions about the implications for free expression, creativity, and the freedom to publish. Under Article 13 ordinary people will have more legal security to post and share content. R.R.Q., 1981, c. N-1.1, r. 3, a. L'article 13 prévoit qu'il est possible de constituer, à l'aide des technologies, l'équivalent fonctionnel d'un sceau sur support papier ou d'un autre instrument semblable. Democrats in the House of Representatives on Tuesday evening released the final text of their resolution to impeach President Donald Trump, charging him with "incitement of insurrection." In your inbox every weekday at 12pm UK time. Qui paie la formation pour le secourisme en milieu de travail? Now it's time for another update. Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. by entering your email address, you agree to our privacy policy, By On October 22, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki published a blogpost warning against the impact of the Directive. The Directive does contain an exemption for “legitimate private and non-commercial use of press publications by individual users,” so it doesn’t look like individuals sharing links on social platforms will have to dip into their pockets. The Information We Collect and Process This site collects and processes two basic types of information: Personally identifiable information: This is information that personally identifies one individual from another or enables you to be individually contacted (for example, names, e-mail addresses and other contact information). "Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people – from creators like you to everyday users – to upload content to platforms like YouTube," she wrote. The only way a site that hosts user-generated content can avoid putting in place a upload filter is if it fulfils all three of the following criteria: it has been available for fewer than three years; it has an annual turnover below €10 million; it had fewer than five million unique monthly visitors. After years of debate and negotiations, politicians have passed sweeping changes following a final vote in the European Parliament. Mary Honeyball, a British Labour MEP who supports Article 13, says. Notre site s'est métamorphosé pour mieux vous servir. A defense motion for Article 13 credit is generally made before pleas are entered. Emiliano Mellino. Get WIRED Daily, your no-nonsense briefing on all the biggest stories in technology, business and science. You can opt out at any time or find out more by reading our cookie policy. These laws not only provide authority for the work we do, but also provide strong protection for the information we collect from individuals and businesses. The remaining 19 member states all voted for the directive. Consulter l'article # Lancer la recherche d'un LSST. No one can quite agree how these platforms are expected to identify and remove this content. Proponents of the Directive on Copyright argue that this means that people are listening to, watching and reading copyrighted material without the creators being properly paid for it. Title 13, U.S. Code. Chris Stokel-Walker, By Morgan Meaker, By Unless the Polish court case changes anything – and that's a big if – individual member states will have two years to turn the new rules into their own national law. They form part of the wider regulations which were passed. Therefore one country may decide that "upload filters" should be implemented using one tool, while another may understand the law in a different. Moderators. "And, if implemented as proposed, Article 13 threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs, European creators, businesses, artists and everyone they employ," she continued, before directing readers to the take the argument to social media with the hashtag "#SaveYourInternet". "The greatest public space we've ever invented mustn't become a casualty of attempts to use copyright law to solve problems not caused by it in the first place. European Parliament voted 348-274 to pass the Copyright Directive Article 12a might stop anyone who isn’t the official organiser of a sports match from posting any videos or photos of that match. "Lawmakers looked at copyright primarily through one very particular lens: that of big media companies, with their waning control over distribution channels," she argued in an editorial. To help clear things up, here’s WIRED’s guide to the EU Directive on Copyright. Big changes are coming to online copyright across the European Union. Will Bedingfield, By EU directives are a form of legislation that set an objective for member states to achieve. Not quite. By "The text only requires that [platforms] either license or remove copyrighted material.". By Welcome to WIRED UK. I have already covered the article 3 and the EUs attempt to regulate the internet in 2 previous videos. "The parliament’s approach is unrealistic in many cases because copyright owners often disagree over who owns what rights," she wrote. Created Jun 13, 2018. It’s worth noting that despite the Directive including an exception that explicitly excludes Wikipedia and GitHub from these rules, both companies have maintained their opposition to the Directive. This site uses cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalised advertising. Proponents of the legislation argue that memes are protected as parodies and so aren’t required to be removed under this directive, but others argue that filters won’t be able to distinguish between memes and other copyrighted material so they’d end up being caught in the crossfire anyway.